If there is one thing American media has taught us, it's that there are two sides to every coin. And only two. Every directly opposing view is valid, no matter how absurd or deplorable. It's the foundation of the willful ignorance and insidious false balance that is now rotting away our capacity to have meaningful discussions. The wider public, which has no reason to be familiar with questions of either climate science or the finer points of the Holocaust, assumes that if there are arguments, there must be reasons for those arguments. Along with a right-wing anti-elitism, an unthinking left- wing open-mindedness and relativism have also given lunatic ideas soil to grow in. Our politeness has actually led us to believe that everybody deserves a say. The problem is that not everybody does deserve a say. Just because an opinion exists does not mean that the opinion is worthy of respect. -Stephen Marche*Some ideas are just plain bad. Whether they be ill/misinformed, wrong, or unsubstantiated thee need to differentiate between them is vital to becoming informed. However differentiating between valid/strong ideas and wrong ones is harder than it seems. However what needs to be understood is that there is more to an argument than pitting it as some sort of false dichotomy, the need to make an argument an either or situation.
*quote adopted from this article , the concluding paragraphs talk more about this issue
